TYPE: Guidance
NUMBER: I-0414
STATUS: Approved, Acceptable to CCIMB, No CCIMB Interpretation
TITLE: Site-Configurable Prevention Of Audit Loss
SUPERSEDES:
I-0348 Audit Data Loss Prevention Method May Be Site-Selectable
EFFECTIVE: 2002-01-04
SOURCE REFERENCE: CC v2.1 Part 2 Subclause 3.6 FAU_STG
CC v2.1 Part 2 Subclause C.6 FAU_STG
RELATED TO:
I-0348 Audit Data Loss Prevention Method May Be Site-Selectable
CCIMB ENTRY: CCIMB-INTERP-0101
ISSUE:
The FAU_STG family does not support a way for the administrator to specify
that the actions taken by the TSF to prevent audit data loss when the audit
trail is full can be site-selectable. Instead, the FAU_STG.4.1 element
explicitly states the actions to be taken by the TSF when the audit log is
full. This wording implicitly prevents a site from selecting the actions taken
to prevent loss of audit data.
STATEMENT
It is acceptable for the TSF to allow the method taken by the TSF to prevent
audit loss when the audit trail is full to be site-selectable, as long as the
TSF provides a pre-determined set of allowable actions and one of these
actions is defined as a default.
SPECIFIC INTERPRETATION
[Note: The changes stated below are ADVISORY ONLY, and represent one approach to addressing
the guidance in the statement. Other approaches that achieve the same goal are
acceptable.]
To address this interpretation, the following changes are made to CC v2.1:
(additions marked
thusly; deletions marked
thusly)
- In Clause 3, Figure 3.1, the component levelling diagram for FAU_STG is
modified to show a
new component, NIAP-0414, that is hierarchically above component 4.
- In Subclause 3.6, the component levelling diagram is modified to show a
new component, NIAP-0414, that is hierarchically above component 4.
- In Subclause 3.6, the following paragraph is added after paragraph 129:
FAU_STG.NIAP-0414 Site-Configurable Prevention of Audit Loss permits the site
to determine the action to be taken when the audit trail is full.
- In Subclause 3.6, the following is added after paragraph 133:
Management: FAU_STG.NIAP-0414
The following actions could be considered for the management functions in FMT:
- Maintenance (deletion, modification, addition) of actions to be taken in
case of audit storage failure.
- In Subclause 3.6, the following is added after paragraph 136:
Audit: FAU_STG.NIAP-0414
The following actions should be auditable if FAU_GEN Security audit data
generation is included in the PP/ST:
- Basic: Actions taken due to the audit storage failure.
- Basic: Selection of an action to be taken when there is an audit storage
failure.
- The following component is added to Subclause 3.6, FAU_STG, after
FAU_STG.4:
FAU_STG.NIAP-0414 Site-Configurable Prevention of Audit Loss
Hierarchical to: FAU_STG.4
FAU_STG.NIAP-0414-1. The TSF shall provide the
administrator the capability to select one or more of the
following actions [selection:
'ignore auditable events', 'prevent auditable
events, except those taken by the authorised user with special rights',
'overwrite the oldest stored audit records'] and [assignment:
other
actions to be taken in case of audit storage failure] to be taken if the
audit trail is full.
FAU_STG.NIAP-0414-2. The TSF shall [selection:
'ignore auditable
events', 'prevent auditable events, except those taken by the authorised user
with special rights', 'overwrite the oldest stored audit records', assignment:
other actions to be taken in case of audit storage failure]]
if the audit trail is full and no other action has been selected.
Dependencies:
- FAU_STG.1 Protected Audit Trail Storage
- FMT_MTD.1 Management of TSF Data
- In Clause C, Figure C.1, the component levelling diagram for FAU_STG is
modified to show a
new component, NIAP-0414, that is hierarchically above component 4.
-
In Subclause C.6, FAU_STG, the following is added after paragraph 640:
FAU_STG.NIAP-0414 Site-Configurable Prevention of Audit Loss
User Application Notes:
This component specifies the set of administrator selectable actions that the
TSF must be capable of performing when the audit trail is full and allows the
administrator to specify which action is to be performed by the TSF. It also
provides a default action to take if the administrator does not select one of
the actions.
Operations
Selection:
In FAU_STG.NIAP-0414-1, the PP/ST author should select one or more of the
following actions that the TSF must have the ability to perform: (1) ignore
auditable actions, (2) prevent the occurrence of auditable actions, and (3)
overwrite the oldest audit records.
In FAU_STG.NIAP-0414-2, the PP/ST author should select one of the actions as
the default action to be performed by the administrator in the event that no
action is selected by the administrator.
Assignment:
In FAU_STG.NIAP-0414-1, the PP/ST author should specify other actions that
should be taken in case of audit storage failure, such as informing an
authorized user.
In FAU_STG.NIAP-0414-2, the PP/ST author should specify other actions that
should be taken in case of audit storage failure when no action has been
selected, such as informing the authorized user.
SUPPORT:
A new component is required that allows a site to select the action(s) to be
performed by the TSF when the audit trail is full. This ability increases the
flexibility of the TOE and allows the TOE to adjust to changing security
needs.
This new component also specifies the default action(s) to be taken if no
action is selected by the administrator.
Note 1: The management section for FAU_STG.4 implies that site-selectable
actions are permitted. This statement is inconsistent with FAU_STG.4.1, which
requires the PP/ST author to explicitly select and assign the actions to be
taken when the audit trail is full.
Note 2: FAU_STG.4 refers to "the authorised user with special rights". This
phrase is not defined and is not used elsewhere in the Common Criteria. In
addition, this interpretation describes the "administrator" as the one
selecting the action performed by the TSF when the audit trail is full, and
"the authorized user with special rights" is notified when the audit trail
fills up. Although it introduces an internal inconsistency in the
interpretation, the phrase was used to be consistent with the wording of
FAU_STG.4.
2003-07: This was reviewed by the CCIMB, who said:
The CCIMB saw no need to adopt this national interpretation. However, use of
this national interpretation will not adversely affect mutual recognition.
The same effects of the interpretation can be accomplished with a combination
of FAU_STG.4 and FMT_MOF.1.
|