|
|
I-0421: Application Notes In Protection Profiles Are Informative Only |
TYPE: Guidance
NUMBER: I-0421
STATUS: Approved, Acceptable to CCIMB, No CCIMB Interpretation
TITLE: Application Notes In Protection Profiles Are Informative
Only
SUPERSEDES:
I-0364 Application Notes In Protection Profiles Are Informative Only
EFFECTIVE: 2001-06-22
SOURCE REFERENCE: CC v2.1 Part 1 Subclause B.2.7
CC v2.1 Part 3 Clause 4 APE
CEM v1.0 Part 2 Clause 3
RELATED TO:
I-0364 Application Notes In Protection Profiles Are Informative Only
CCIMB ENTRY: CCIMB-INTERP-0108
ISSUE:Application notes in PPs, because they are intended to be informative, should not contain normative text and should not conflict with the normative portions of a PP.STATEMENTApplication notes in PPs are not normative; they provide information only.SPECIFIC INTERPRETATION[Note: The changes stated below are ADVISORY ONLY, and represent one approach to addressing the guidance in the statement. Other approaches that achieve the same goal are acceptable.] To address this interpretation, the following changes are made to CC v2.1, and to the CEM, v1.0:
SUPPORT:The words in Part 1, Section B.2.7 are potentially misleading with respect to application notes, as the phrase "useful for the ... evaluation" has been read by some to allow normative material in application notes. However, for functional elements, the application notes are contained in the Part 2 Annex, which states at the beginning of the annex:This annex contains informative guidance for the families and components found in the main body of Part 2, which may be required by users, developers or evaluators to use the components. Further, Section A.1.2 of the Part 2 Annex clearly notes that any user or evaluator notes are informative (A.1.2.2, A.1.2.3). Section A.1.3.2 notes that the application notes at the component level are "additional refinement in terms of narrative qualification as it pertains to a specific component." Refinement of an informative section can never be normative. This leads to the conclusion that application notes are informative only, and that any normative material should be expressed through predefined components, refinements of predefined components (such as to specify a specific method of implementation) or explicitly specified requirements. Further, application notes should not contradict the document element to which they apply. For example, it would be confusing to an evaluator or developer to have an element require only passwords, and the associated application discuss the use of non-password biometric devices. A larger scope of consistency analysis is not required due to transitivity: if the note is consistent with its associated element, and that element is consistent with the remainder of the PP (when called for in the APE requirements), then the application note should be similarly consistent. Application notes are unique in Part 1, Annex B in that they are not explicitly mentioned in any other document area, and in that they are optional. However, practice has allowed them to appear in other document areas. As such, the easiest way to address application notes in Part 3 was to create a new family to address application notes, wherever they may appear. Note: This interpretation is superseding a previously-approved formal interpretation primarily to reflect modifications to the interpretation format. The intent of the interpretation has not been changed, although some specifics of the criteria changes or the support may have been clarified or corrected. 2003-08: The CCIMB issued the following statement on CCIMB-RI-0108, which corresponds to I-0421: The intent of RI-108 is agreed upon by the CCIMB, but not the specific approach. The CCIMB disagrees with the need to insert the additional information on application notes into APE as proposed by this national interpretation. However, they agreed that the role of application notes in Protection Profiles needed to be clarified. This clarification has been included in the resolution to RI-222. This National Interpretation partly arises from a misunderstanding of the use of the term "normative," confusing "normative" with "mandatory." This has been clarified in the resolution to RI-222. The rewrite of ASE and APE (via the resolution to RI-215) addresses the use of application notes in Protection Profile. |