Assurance Continuity - Scalar and Express P-series SSD, version NV.R1900
CC Certificate
Validation Report
Assurance Activity
Administrative Guide
Please note:
The above files are for the Original Evaluated TOE.
Consequently, they do not refer to this maintained version, although they apply to the maintained version.
Security Target
*
Assurance Continuity Maintenance Report
Administrative Guide
Please note:
This serves as an addendum to the VR for the Original Evaluated TOE.
*
This is the Security Target (ST) associated with this latest Maintenance Release.
To view previous STs for this TOE, click here.
Readers are reminded that the certification of this product (TOE) is the result of maintenance, rather than an actual re-evaluation of the product.
Maintenance only considers the affect of TOE changes on the assurance baseline (i.e. the original evaluated TOE);
maintenance is not intended to provide assurance in regard to the resistance of the TOE to new vulnerabilities or attack methods discovered since the date of the initial certificate.
Such assurance can only be gained through re-evaluation.
Using a security impact analysis of the changes made to the TOE, which was provided by the developer, the CCEVS has determined that the impact of changes on the TOE are considered minor and that independent evaluator analysis was not necessary.
A summary of the results can be found in the Maintenance Report, which is written in relation to the product's original validation report and Security Target.
Readers are therefore reminded to read the Security Target, Validation Report, and the Assurance Maintenance Report to fully understand the meaning of what a maintained certificate represents.
Product Description
The changes are summarized below.
Major Changes
None.
Minor Changes
No changes were made to the individual products within the validated TOE.
Additional models of the hard drive are being proposed to be included in the maintained TOE. Eleven models of storage drives are proposed for addition.
As per the previous evaluation documented in “Scalar and Express P-series SSD, version NV.R1900 Security Target, version 1.0, 06 June 2022”, together with this assurance continuity activity, the final set of claimed supported evaluated devices is:
TOE developer Original Part No.
|
HW Ver.
|
Description (Form factor & Interface)
|
Firmware Ver.
|
User Capacity
|
Certification Sponsor
Reseller Part No.
|
Previously Validated TOE Models
|
NS361P500GCCR-1F
|
04MB3
|
2.5" SATA 7mm
|
NV.R1900_1000
|
500GB
|
AMP25T500-IM02AI
|
NS371P02T0CC1-1F
|
08MN3
|
2.5" SATA 7mm
|
NV.R1900_1000
|
2TB
|
AMP25TT20-IM02AI
|
NS371P04T0CC1-1F
|
16MN3
|
2.5" SATA 7mm
|
NV.R1900_1000
|
4TB
|
AMP25TT40-IM02AI
|
NS371P10T0CC0-1F
|
16MN3
|
2.5" SATA 9.5mm
|
NV.R1900_1000
|
10TB
|
AMP25TT10-IM02AI
|
NS561P500GCE7-1F
|
02MB3
|
M.2 2280 PCIe/NVMe
|
NV.R1900_1000
|
500GB
|
AMPW5D500-IM02AI
|
NS571P02T0CK7-1F
|
16SN3
|
M.2 22110 PCIe/NVMe
|
NV.R1900_1000
|
2TB
|
AMPW6DT20-IM02AI
|
NS571P08T0CC0-1F
|
16MN3
|
2.5” PCIe/NVMe (U.2)
|
NV.R1900_1000
|
8TB
|
AMP2UDT80-IM02AI
|
New TOE Models
|
NS371P01T0CC1-1F
|
04MN3
|
2.5" SATA 7mm
|
NV.R1900_1000
|
1TB
|
AMP2500T0T10-IM020CP
|
NS371P08T0CC0-1F
|
16MN3
|
2.5" SATA 9.5mm
|
NV.R1900_1000
|
8TB
|
AMP2500T08T0-IM020CP
|
NS379P16T0VC0-1F
|
32MN1
|
2.5" SATA 9.5mm
|
NV.R1900_1000
|
16TB
|
AMP2500T16T0-IM020CP
|
NS379P20T0VC0-1F
|
32MN1
|
2.5" SATA 9.5mm
|
NV.R1900_1000
|
20TB
|
AMP2500T20T0-IM020CP
|
NS361P125GCM7-1F
|
04MBB
|
M.2 2242, SATA
|
NV.R1900_1000
|
125GB
|
AMPW300T0125-IM020CP
|
NS369P250GVM7-1F
|
04MBA
|
M.2 2242, SATA
|
NV.R1900_1000
|
250GB
|
AMPW300T0250-IM020CP
|
NS369P500GVM7-1F
|
04MBA
|
M.2 2242, SATA
|
NV.R1900_1000
|
500GB
|
AMPW300T0500-IM020CP
|
NS369P01T0VE7-1F
|
04MB1
|
M.2 2280, SATA
|
NV.R1900_1000
|
1TB
|
AMPW500T0T10-IM020CP
|
NS369P01T0VA7-1F
|
04MB1
|
mSATA SATA
|
NV.R1900_1000
|
1TB
|
AMPV500T0T10-IM020CP
|
NS569P500GVM7-1F
|
04MBA
|
M.2 2242, PCIe/NVMe
|
NV.R1900_1000
|
500GB
|
AMPW300D0500-IM020CP
|
NS579P04T0VK7-1F
|
16SN1
|
M.2 22110, PCIe/NVMe
|
NV.R1900_1000
|
4TB
|
AMPW600D04T0-IM020CP
|
The table below identifies each of the eleven proposed models, the differences between the proposed models and those within the validated TOE, and a determination as to whether the differences are considered security relevant.
Identifying Delta Between the Validated TOE and proposed TOE Models
|
Original Part No. For the Proposed model
|
Description
|
Changes
|
Security Relevant Change?
|
NS371P01T0CC1-1F
|
Functionally identical to the following validated models:
- NS361P500GCCR-1F
- NS371P02T0CC1-1F
- NS371P04T0CC1-1F
|
Storage Capacity:
- Proposed model has 1TB capacity as compared to the capacity of 500GB, 2TB and 4TB of the previously validated comparable models.
|
No.
|
NS371P08T0CC0-1F, NS379P16T0VC0-1F, NS379P20T0VC0-1F
|
Functionally identical to the following validated model:
- NS371P10T0CC0-1F
|
Storage Capacity:
- Proposed models have 8TB, 16TB,and 20TB capacity as compared to the capacity of 10TB for the previously validated comparable model.
|
No.
|
NS361P125GCM7-1F, NS369P250GVM7-1F, NS369P500GVM7-1F, NS369P01T0VE7-1F
|
Functionally identical to the following validated models:
- NS361P500GCCR-1F
- NS371P02T0CC1-1F
- NS371P04T0CC1-1F
|
Storage Capacity:
- Proposed models have 125GB, 250GB, 500GB and 1TB capacity as compared to the capacity of 500GB, 2TB and 4TB of the previously validated comparable models.
Form Factor:
- Proposed model’s form factor is ‘M.2’ as opposed to 2.5”; SATA protocol is identical. (Note that M.2 2242 vs M.2 2280 just differ in physical length of the of the PCB card)
|
No.
|
NS369P01T0VA7-1F
|
Functionally identical to the following validated models:
- NS361P500GCCR-1F
- NS371P02T0CC1-1F
- NS371P04T0CC1-1F
|
Storage Capacity:
- Proposed model has 1TB capacity as compared to the capacity of 500GB, 2TB and 4TB of the previously validated comparable models.
Form Factor:
- Proposed model’s form factor is ‘mSATA’ as opposed to 2.5”; SATA protocol is identical.
|
No.
|
NS569P500GVM7-1F
|
Functionally identical to the following validated model:
- NS561P500GCE7-1F
|
Form Factor:
- Proposed model’s form factor is ‘M.2 2242’ versus ‘M.2 2280’ of the validated model; SATA protocol is identical. (Note that M.2 2242 vs M.2 2280 just differ in physical length of the PCB card)
|
No.
|
NS579P04T0VK7-1F
|
Functionally identical to the following validated model:
- NS571P02T0CK7-1F
|
Storage Capacity:
- Proposed model has 4TB capacity as compared to 2TB of the previously validated comparable model.
|
No.
|
Vendor Information
Novachips Co., Ltd.
SJ Yoo +82-70-8853-8555 +031-733-8533
sj.yoo@novachips.com
http://www.novachips.com/
|